Scientific and Medical Equipment House vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
A head-to-head of Scientific and Medical Equipment House (4014) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
Scientific and Medical Equipment House
4014
28.54 SAR
+0.14%
VS
Becton, Dickinson and Company
BDX
$158.17
-1.10%
| Metric | 4014 | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | 901.20M SAR | $43.58B |
| P/E (TTM) | 30.04 | 27.18 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.93 |
| P/S | 1.06 | 1.82 |
| P/B | 1.68 | 2.43 |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.44 | 9.25 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% | 2.02% |
| Profit Margin | 3.43% | 5.33% |
| Gross Margin | 13.93% | 45.44% |
| Operating Margin | 4.55% | 13.67% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -13.37% | +5.22% |
| FCF Yield | -0.03% | 7.55% |
| Debt / Equity | 32.47 | 71.60 |
| Current Ratio | 2.44 | 0.94 |
Which is better: Scientific and Medical Equipment House or Becton, Dickinson and Company?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Becton, Dickinson and Company
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Becton, Dickinson and Company
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Scientific and Medical Equipment House
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Becton, Dickinson and Company
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Becton, Dickinson and Company
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Becton, Dickinson and Company
Across 12 available metrics, Becton, Dickinson and Company leads 7–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Scientific and Medical Equipment House with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.