National Agricultural Development Co. vs McCormick & Company, Incorporat
A head-to-head of National Agricultural Development Co. (6010) and McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
National Agricultural Development Co.
6010
15.47 SAR
+0.85%
VS
McCormick & Company, Incorporat
MKC
$51.70
-2.27%
| Metric | 6010 | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | 5.07B SAR | $13.90B |
| P/E (TTM) | 11.81 | 17.65 |
| Forward P/E | 10.84 | 15.28 |
| P/S | 1.48 | 1.96 |
| P/B | 0.99 | 1.84 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.35 | 13.87 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.59% |
| Profit Margin | 11.17% | 21.99% |
| Gross Margin | 32.98% | 37.90% |
| Operating Margin | 10.79% | 15.96% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -9.25% | +16.70% |
| FCF Yield | 4.97% | 6.10% |
| Debt / Equity | 5.99 | 65.14 |
| Current Ratio | 2.36 | 0.78 |
Which is better: National Agricultural Development Co. or McCormick & Company, Incorporat?
- ✓Larger by market cap: McCormick & Company, Incorporat
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): National Agricultural Development Co.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): McCormick & Company, Incorporat
- ✓Faster revenue growth: McCormick & Company, Incorporat
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: McCormick & Company, Incorporat
Across 12 available metrics, National Agricultural Development Co. leads 7–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare National Agricultural Development Co. with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.