Natural Gas Distribution Company vs Atmos Energy Corporation
A head-to-head of Natural Gas Distribution Company (9516) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | 9516 | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | 135.20M SAR | $29.66B |
| P/E (TTM) | 15.31 | 23.82 |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.76 |
| P/S | 0.91 | 6.03 |
| P/B | 1.82 | 1.99 |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.13 | 15.34 |
| Dividend Yield | 222.00% | 2.04% |
| Profit Margin | 5.13% | 27.58% |
| Gross Margin | 7.52% | 58.13% |
| Operating Margin | 2.79% | 33.17% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +32.50% | +0.61% |
| FCF Yield | — | -6.76% |
| Debt / Equity | 11.55 | 64.59 |
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | 1.00 |
Which is better: Natural Gas Distribution Company or Atmos Energy Corporation?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Atmos Energy Corporation
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Natural Gas Distribution Company
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Natural Gas Distribution Company
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Atmos Energy Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Natural Gas Distribution Company
Across 11 available metrics, Natural Gas Distribution Company leads 8–3.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Natural Gas Distribution Company with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.