Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co. vs Ferrovial N.V.
A head-to-head of Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co. (9547) and Ferrovial N.V. (FER) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | 9547 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | 21.29M SAR | $45.50B |
| P/E (TTM) | 11.38 | 44.81 |
| Forward P/E | — | 45.80 |
| P/S | 0.16 | 5.17 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 5.32 |
| EV/EBITDA | — | 40.05 |
| Dividend Yield | 258.00% | 2.38% |
| Profit Margin | -18.48% | 9.57% |
| Gross Margin | 10.03% | 88.32% |
| Operating Margin | -3.21% | 10.04% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -42.50% | -16.21% |
| FCF Yield | — | — |
| Debt / Equity | 121.77 | 136.03 |
| Current Ratio | 2.18 | 1.13 |
Which is better: Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co. or Ferrovial N.V.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Ferrovial N.V.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co.
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Ferrovial N.V.
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Ferrovial N.V.
Across 10 available metrics, Rawasi Al Bina Investment Co. leads 6–4.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.