Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
A head-to-head of Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | AMAT | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $420.53B | $391.80B |
| P/E (TTM) | 49.73 | 59.11 |
| Forward P/E | 31.63 | 38.77 |
| P/S | 11.04 | 17.61 |
| P/B | 45.13 | 87.65 |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.77 | 48.53 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 0.13% |
| Profit Margin | 29.31% | 30.94% |
| Gross Margin | 48.67% | 48.70% |
| Operating Margin | 29.86% | 32.01% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +11.41% | +23.76% |
| FCF Yield | 1.67% | 1.57% |
| Debt / Equity | 27.00 | 35.28 |
| Current Ratio | 2.51 | 2.54 |
Which is better: Applied Materials, Inc. or Lam Research Corporation?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Applied Materials, Inc.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Applied Materials, Inc.
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Applied Materials, Inc.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Lam Research Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Lam Research Corporation
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Applied Materials, Inc.
Across 13 available metrics, Applied Materials, Inc. leads 8–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Applied Materials, Inc. with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.