ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re vs Lam Research Corporation
A head-to-head of ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re (ASML) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | ASML | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $671.25B | $391.80B |
| P/E (TTM) | 55.42 | 59.11 |
| Forward P/E | 30.32 | 38.77 |
| P/S | 15.84 | 17.61 |
| P/B | 27.06 | 87.65 |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.34 | 48.53 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.13% |
| Profit Margin | 30.11% | 30.94% |
| Gross Margin | 52.83% | 48.70% |
| Operating Margin | 34.60% | 32.01% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +21.25% | +23.76% |
| FCF Yield | 1.61% | 1.57% |
| Debt / Equity | 16.80 | 35.28 |
| Current Ratio | 1.33 | 2.54 |
Which is better: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re or Lam Research Corporation?
- ✓Larger by market cap: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓Higher dividend yield: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Lam Research Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Lam Research Corporation
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
Across 13 available metrics, ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re leads 10–3.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.