Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
A head-to-head of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | CDNS | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $91.05B | $147.50B |
| P/E (TTM) | 76.95 | 18.07 |
| Forward P/E | 38.05 | 16.83 |
| P/S | 17.81 | 2.72 |
| P/B | 13.88 | 5.72 |
| EV/EBITDA | 49.36 | 21.88 |
| Dividend Yield | — | — |
| Profit Margin | 21.18% | 15.91% |
| Gross Margin | 86.36% | 39.75% |
| Operating Margin | 31.15% | 10.70% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +18.66% | +14.48% |
| FCF Yield | 1.45% | 6.70% |
| Debt / Equity | 44.29 | 40.73 |
| Current Ratio | 1.47 | 1.07 |
Which is better: Cadence Design Systems, Inc. or Uber Technologies, Inc.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Uber Technologies, Inc.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Uber Technologies, Inc.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Across 12 available metrics, Uber Technologies, Inc. leads 7–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Cadence Design Systems, Inc. with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.