ConocoPhillips vs EQT Corporation
A head-to-head of ConocoPhillips (COP) and EQT Corporation (EQT) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | COP | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $139.75B | $31.00B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.48 | 9.40 |
| Forward P/E | 12.80 | 11.86 |
| P/S | 2.47 | 3.97 |
| P/B | 4.01 | 1.08 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.01 | 5.55 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 1.29% |
| Profit Margin | 12.58% | 34.39% |
| Gross Margin | 25.09% | 45.88% |
| Operating Margin | 19.24% | 36.09% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.58% | +49.54% |
| FCF Yield | 3.99% | 10.93% |
| Debt / Equity | 36.14 | 20.82 |
| Current Ratio | 1.29 | 0.66 |
Which is better: ConocoPhillips or EQT Corporation?
- ✓Larger by market cap: ConocoPhillips
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): EQT Corporation
- ✓Higher dividend yield: ConocoPhillips
- ✓More profitable (net margin): EQT Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: EQT Corporation
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: EQT Corporation
Across 13 available metrics, EQT Corporation leads 10–3.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.