W.W. Grainger, Inc. vs Marketing Home Group for Trading Co.
A head-to-head of W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Marketing Home Group for Trading Co. (4194) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | GWW | 4194 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $65.86B | 656.32M SAR |
| P/E (TTM) | 37.52 | 13.97 |
| Forward P/E | 25.19 | — |
| P/S | 3.25 | 1.65 |
| P/B | 35.22 | 2.35 |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.17 | 9.77 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 10.97% |
| Profit Margin | 9.70% | 11.44% |
| Gross Margin | 39.06% | 52.70% |
| Operating Margin | 13.91% | 16.74% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +10.13% | -20.25% |
| FCF Yield | 2.31% | — |
| Debt / Equity | 55.51 | 0.01 |
| Current Ratio | 2.69 | 3.68 |
Which is better: W.W. Grainger, Inc. or Marketing Home Group for Trading Co.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: W.W. Grainger, Inc.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Marketing Home Group for Trading Co.
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Marketing Home Group for Trading Co.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Marketing Home Group for Trading Co.
- ✓Faster revenue growth: W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Across 11 available metrics, Marketing Home Group for Trading Co. leads 10–1.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.