Intuitive Surgical, Inc. vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
A head-to-head of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | ISRG | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $122.33B | $43.58B |
| P/E (TTM) | 41.87 | 27.18 |
| Forward P/E | 28.83 | 10.93 |
| P/S | 14.66 | 1.82 |
| P/B | 6.96 | 2.43 |
| EV/EBITDA | 38.80 | 9.25 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.02% |
| Profit Margin | 28.15% | 5.33% |
| Gross Margin | 66.00% | 45.44% |
| Operating Margin | 29.27% | 13.67% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +22.96% | +5.22% |
| FCF Yield | 1.83% | 7.55% |
| Debt / Equity | — | 71.60 |
| Current Ratio | 4.61 | 0.94 |
Which is better: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or Becton, Dickinson and Company?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Becton, Dickinson and Company
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Becton, Dickinson and Company
Across 11 available metrics, Becton, Dickinson and Company leads 6–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Intuitive Surgical, Inc. with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.