Kimberly-Clark Corporation vs Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T
A head-to-head of Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T (EL) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | KMB | EL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.97B | $29.71B |
| P/E (TTM) | 17.01 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.34 | 27.43 |
| P/S | 1.93 | 2.11 |
| P/B | 21.43 | 12.36 |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.72 | 15.97 |
| Dividend Yield | 4.08% | 1.03% |
| Profit Margin | 12.80% | -1.67% |
| Gross Margin | 36.01% | 73.97% |
| Operating Margin | 14.29% | 7.96% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +2.69% | +4.56% |
| FCF Yield | 5.76% | 4.10% |
| Debt / Equity | 370.11 | 183.12 |
| Current Ratio | 0.77 | 1.27 |
Which is better: Kimberly-Clark Corporation or Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Kimberly-Clark Corporation
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Kimberly-Clark Corporation
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Kimberly-Clark Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Across 12 available metrics, Kimberly-Clark Corporation leads 7–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.