MetLife, Inc. vs AFLAC Incorporated
A head-to-head of MetLife, Inc. (MET) and AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | MET | AFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $60.48B | $63.48B |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.22 | 14.16 |
| Forward P/E | 7.57 | 15.53 |
| P/S | 0.69 | 3.24 |
| P/B | 4.05 | 5.66 |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.77 | 11.30 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.71% |
| Profit Margin | 4.76% | 25.32% |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +1.79% | +27.66% |
| FCF Yield | — | 4.95% |
| Debt / Equity | 76.00 | 26.11 |
| Current Ratio | 2.09 | 0.94 |
Which is better: MetLife, Inc. or AFLAC Incorporated?
- ✓Larger by market cap: AFLAC Incorporated
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): AFLAC Incorporated
- ✓Higher dividend yield: MetLife, Inc.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): AFLAC Incorporated
- ✓Faster revenue growth: AFLAC Incorporated
Very close — each leads on 5 metrics.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.