Pacific Gas & Electric Co. vs Saudi Energy Co.
A head-to-head of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PCG) and Saudi Energy Co. (5110) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | PCG | 5110 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $38.14B | 73.29B SAR |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.37 | 18.32 |
| Forward P/E | 9.96 | 14.44 |
| P/S | 1.39 | 0.69 |
| P/B | 1.19 | 0.28 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.52 | 6.43 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.88% | 3.99% |
| Profit Margin | 11.43% | 13.30% |
| Gross Margin | 19.59% | 20.33% |
| Operating Margin | 19.59% | 18.76% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +15.01% | +9.41% |
| FCF Yield | -11.76% | -36.31% |
| Debt / Equity | 188.07 | 79.96 |
| Current Ratio | 1.20 | 0.47 |
Which is better: Pacific Gas & Electric Co. or Saudi Energy Co.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Saudi Energy Co.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Saudi Energy Co.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Saudi Energy Co.
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Across 13 available metrics, Saudi Energy Co. leads 7–6.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.