Sprott Physical Gold Trust vs Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
A head-to-head of Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (SSNLF) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | PHYS | SSNLF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.54B | $428.21B |
| P/E (TTM) | 2.75 | 31.70 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 4.72 |
| P/S | 2.78 | 0.00 |
| P/B | 1.02 | 3.31 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.00 | 12.01 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.71% |
| Profit Margin | 249.43% | 13.27% |
| Gross Margin | 69.47% | 39.39% |
| Operating Margin | 4059.21% | 13.07% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +371.89% | +23.82% |
| FCF Yield | -0.29% | 8220.63% |
| Debt / Equity | — | 5.08 |
| Current Ratio | — | 2.33 |
Which is better: Sprott Physical Gold Trust or Samsung Electronics Co Ltd?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Sprott Physical Gold Trust
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Sprott Physical Gold Trust
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Sprott Physical Gold Trust
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Across 8 available metrics, Sprott Physical Gold Trust leads 6–2.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Sprott Physical Gold Trust with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.