Silicon Motion Technology vs Orsted A/S
A head-to-head of Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) and Orsted A/S (DOGEF) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | SIMO | DOGEF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.07B | $537.44B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.89 | 126.35 |
| Forward P/E | 26.25 | 0.66 |
| P/S | 5.72 | 7.34 |
| P/B | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| EV/EBITDA | 40.05 | 15.58 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | — |
| Profit Margin | 13.85% | 2.97% |
| Gross Margin | 48.27% | -2.70% |
| Operating Margin | 10.51% | -2.70% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +45.67% | +12.75% |
| FCF Yield | 0.13% | -5.87% |
| Debt / Equity | — | 83.48 |
| Current Ratio | 2.79 | 1.94 |
Which is better: Silicon Motion Technology or Orsted A/S?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Orsted A/S
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Silicon Motion Technology
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Silicon Motion Technology
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Silicon Motion Technology
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Silicon Motion Technology
Across 11 available metrics, Silicon Motion Technology leads 8–3.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Silicon Motion Technology with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.