Teradyne, Inc. vs ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
A head-to-head of Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re (ASML) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | TER | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $50.46B | $671.25B |
| P/E (TTM) | 59.70 | 55.42 |
| Forward P/E | 32.77 | 30.32 |
| P/S | 13.27 | 15.84 |
| P/B | 16.05 | 27.06 |
| EV/EBITDA | 43.13 | 37.34 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.44% |
| Profit Margin | 22.55% | 30.11% |
| Gross Margin | 58.22% | 52.83% |
| Operating Margin | 21.59% | 34.60% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +87.04% | +21.25% |
| FCF Yield | 1.10% | 1.61% |
| Debt / Equity | 6.36 | 16.80 |
| Current Ratio | 2.15 | 1.33 |
Which is better: Teradyne, Inc. or ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re?
- ✓Larger by market cap: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓Higher dividend yield: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓More profitable (net margin): ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Teradyne, Inc.
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re
Across 13 available metrics, ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re leads 7–6.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
Compare Teradyne, Inc. with others
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.