Texas Pacific Land Corporation vs Diamondback Energy, Inc.
A head-to-head of Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | TPL | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.67B | $55.01B |
| P/E (TTM) | 56.95 | 227.37 |
| Forward P/E | 5.47 | 11.04 |
| P/S | 32.89 | 3.67 |
| P/B | 18.50 | 1.29 |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.65 | 7.19 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 2.11% |
| Profit Margin | 60.03% | 1.88% |
| Gross Margin | 85.46% | 34.97% |
| Operating Margin | 74.19% | 32.94% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +20.84% | +4.44% |
| FCF Yield | 0.15% | -1.48% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.16 | 32.59 |
| Current Ratio | 4.23 | 0.56 |
Which is better: Texas Pacific Land Corporation or Diamondback Energy, Inc.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Diamondback Energy, Inc.
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Texas Pacific Land Corporation
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Diamondback Energy, Inc.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Texas Pacific Land Corporation
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Texas Pacific Land Corporation
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Texas Pacific Land Corporation
Across 13 available metrics, Texas Pacific Land Corporation leads 9–4.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.