Skip to content
All news
Regulatory

Jury Dismisses Musk's OpenAI Lawsuit in Under Two Hours

A California jury dismissed Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI after less than two hours of deliberation, ending one of Silicon Valley's most contentious legal battles. The lawsuit sought $134 billion in damages.

May 18, 2026
2 min read
Source: Moby
Share:

Key Numbers

demands
$134 billion
trial duration
three weeks
verdict time
under two hours

After three weeks of testimony and demands for a record $134 billion in damages, a California jury dismissed Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI in under two hours. The swift verdict suggests the jurors found no legal basis for the claims.

Case Details

Musk filed the lawsuit in 2024, accusing OpenAI and its executives Sam Altman and Greg Brockman of violating the company's founding non-profit agreements by shifting to a for-profit model. He sought massive damages and a restructuring of the company. However, OpenAI's lawyers presented evidence that Musk was aware of and initially supported the changes.

Company's Position

OpenAI stated that the verdict confirms its commitment to its original mission while allowing for sustainable growth. It noted that Musk left the board in 2018 and has not been involved in decisions since.

Precedents and Context

This is not the first time Musk has sued tech companies. In 2022, he filed a similar lawsuit against Twitter before completing the acquisition. The case also highlights the ongoing tension between Musk and the AI community.

Potential Financial Impact

The ruling imposes no financial obligations on OpenAI, but it removes the legal uncertainty that had been hanging over the company. For Tesla, the verdict may reduce distractions for Musk, but it does not directly affect its business.

Frequently Asked Questions

Elon Musk demanded $134 billion in damages in his lawsuit against OpenAI.

Found this useful? Share it

Share:
This article was rewritten in Wrqti's editorial style based on information from the original source above. Content is informational only — not investment advice.