Skip to content
All news
Analysis

Is Procter & Gamble (PG) Still Undervalued After 7,000 Job Cuts?

Simply Wall St analysis indicates Procter & Gamble (PG) stock may still be undervalued, with a 20.8% total return over five years. DCF model and earnings multiples both suggest the stock is below intrinsic value. Planned cuts of up to 7,000 non-manufacturing roles could support margins.

July 16, 2026
2 min read
Source: Simply Wall St.
Share:

Key Numbers

total return 5y
20.8%
job cuts
7,000

An analysis by Simply Wall St suggests that Procter & Gamble (PG) may still be trading below its fair value, despite delivering a total return of approximately 20.8% over the past five years. The valuation is based on a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model and earnings multiples, both of which indicate the stock is undervalued.

Fair Value Assessment

According to the DCF model, PG shares are currently trading below their intrinsic value. Additionally, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is lower than the sector average, reinforcing the view that the market has not fully priced in the company's potential.

Job Cuts and Margin Support

Procter & Gamble announced plans to eliminate up to 7,000 non-manufacturing roles. This move is expected to improve operating margins and boost free cash flow, which could positively impact future valuation.

Long-Term Stock Performance

The 20.8% total return over five years reflects steady value creation rather than a sharp rerating. This consistent performance supports the notion that the stock still has untapped growth potential.

What This Means for Investors

The analysis does not provide a buy or sell recommendation, but it suggests that the current valuation may offer a margin of safety for long-term investors. It is advisable to monitor the job cut implementation and its impact on margins before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Procter & Gamble's total return over the past five years is approximately 20.8%.

Found this useful? Share it

Share:
This article was rewritten in Wrqti's editorial style based on information from the original source above. Content is informational only — not investment advice.