Skip to content
All news
Analysis

Forget Palantir as It Bounces Back and Get in Salesforce Before Wall Street Wakes Up to Real Value

As retail traders rush back into Palantir as a speculative stock, analysis indicates Salesforce is quietly generating record cash flows and beating earnings estimates by double digits, making the valuation gap between the two the widest in years.

July 13, 2026
2 min read
Source: 24/7 Wall St.
Share:

While retail traders rush back into Palantir (PLTR) as if it were a lottery ticket, analysis from 24/7 Wall St. suggests that mega-cap Salesforce (CRM) is quietly printing record cash flows and beating earnings estimates by double digits. The valuation gap between hype and reality has rarely been this wide.

Recommendation Change

No explicit buy or sell recommendation was issued, but the analysis leans toward Salesforce being undervalued relative to Palantir.

Analyst's Rationale

The analysis highlights that Salesforce, unlike Palantir, has strong fundamentals including record free cash flows and earnings beats exceeding 10% above expectations. Palantir, by contrast, is viewed as a high-valuation speculative stock without comparable financial backing.

Context

Palantir's stock recently bounced back after a decline, attracting retail traders. However, Salesforce, as a mature tech company, continues to deliver strong financial results without the same media attention. Other analysts have not yet commented on this specific comparison.

What to Make of It

Investors are encouraged to compare valuations carefully: Salesforce offers solid value backed by earnings and cash flows, while Palantir relies on speculative momentum. The article does not recommend buying or selling either stock but calls for independent assessment based on financial data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Because Salesforce generates record cash flows and beats earnings estimates by double digits, while Palantir trades at a high valuation without comparable financial backing.

Found this useful? Share it

Share:
This article was rewritten in Wrqti's editorial style based on information from the original source above. Content is informational only — not investment advice.