NTSB: UPS Plane Crash Could Have Been Prevented With Original Inspection Schedule
Testimony before the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) indicated that a relaxed engine inspection schedule for Boeing 737s allowed a flaw to go undetected, leading to a UPS plane crash that killed 15. Boeing relied on outdated data to justify extending inspection intervals, and the FAA approved the request without seeking additional information.
Key Numbers
Testimony before the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on Wednesday revealed that the crash of a UPS cargo plane last year, which killed 15 people, could have been prevented if the original inspection schedule had not been relaxed. Mechanics did not closely examine the parts that should have prevented the engine from detaching from the wing because federal regulators allowed Boeing to recommend less frequent checks.
Details of the Action
Investigations showed that Boeing relied on older data when it requested an extension of the inspection schedule in 2015, without accounting for seven prior instances on other aircraft of the same model where key engine mount parts failed. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved the request after only a month of review, without seeking further information.
Company's Position
Boeing has not officially commented on the testimony but has previously stated its commitment to safety. The company is expected to present its defense in upcoming hearings.
Precedents and Context
This is not the first time concerns have been raised about Boeing 737 engine inspection schedules. In 2018, a similar incident on a Southwest Airlines plane resulted in a passenger fatality, prompting a review of inspection procedures.
Potential Financial Impact
Boeing may face additional lawsuits and compensation claims, as well as potential fines from the FAA. The incident could also lead to increased maintenance and inspection costs for the 737 fleet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Found this useful? Share it