Skip to content
All news
General

DGRO vs. VIG: Which Dividend-Growth ETF Compounds Your Income Faster?

A comparison between DGRO and VIG, two popular dividend-growth ETFs that invest in large-cap U.S. companies with a history of raising dividends. The key differences lie in their index rules and selection criteria.

July 4, 2026
2 min read
Source: 24/7 Wall St.
Share:

The iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) look like siblings on any fund screener: both hunt large-cap U.S. companies with a history of raising dividends, both charge single-digit basis points, and both distribute quarterly. The real divergence sits in the fine print of their index rules.

Details

Selection Criteria

  • VIG: Tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, requiring at least 10 consecutive years of dividend increases. This makes it more selective and focused on stable dividend growers.
  • DGRO: Tracks the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, requiring only 5 years of dividend growth, allowing inclusion of faster-growing companies.

Yields and Distributions

  • VIG: Lower dividend yield (around 1.8%) but more consistent dividend growth.
  • DGRO: Slightly higher yield (around 2.1%) with potential for faster growth.

Fees

  • VIG: Expense ratio 0.06%.
  • DGRO: Expense ratio 0.08%.

Context

Both ETFs are excellent choices for investors seeking growing income with relatively low risk. The choice depends on investor preference: if you prioritize stability in dividend growth, VIG may be better. If you prefer a slightly higher yield with faster growth potential, DGRO could be the pick.

What This Means for Investors

There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Investors should evaluate their investment goals and time horizon. Both funds can complement a dividend-focused portfolio.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is in stock selection criteria: VIG requires 10 consecutive years of dividend increases, while DGRO requires only 5 years.

Found this useful? Share it

Share:
This article was rewritten in Wrqti's editorial style based on information from the original source above. Content is informational only — not investment advice.