Skip to content
All news
Analysis

ServiceNow vs. Atlassian: Which Cloud Stock Has the Edge?

A recent Zacks analysis suggests Atlassian (TEAM) has a relative edge over ServiceNow (NOW) in the cloud software space, driven by AI momentum and a more attractive valuation, while NOW faces margin pressure from multiple acquisitions.

July 13, 2026
2 min read
Source: Zacks
Share:

According to a Zacks report, Atlassian (TEAM) holds a relative edge over ServiceNow (NOW) in the cloud software market, thanks to its AI-driven momentum and lower valuation, while NOW contends with margin pressure from multiple acquisitions.

Analyst Rationale

Analysts highlight that Atlassian benefits from its increasing adoption of artificial intelligence across its cloud products, boosting revenue growth and operational efficiency. Additionally, TEAM trades at a lower valuation compared to NOW, making it more attractive from a value perspective.

In contrast, ServiceNow faces margin pressure due to elevated costs from recent acquisitions, which could limit its ability to improve profitability in the near term.

Context

Both stocks have shown divergent performance recently, with Atlassian posting stronger revenue growth driven by new AI-powered cloud offerings. ServiceNow maintains its leadership in IT service management (ITSM), but margin challenges persist.

Other analysts hold mixed views: some believe ServiceNow retains a strong competitive moat in the enterprise market, while others see Atlassian better positioned for faster growth.

What to Make of It

The choice between the two stocks depends on investor priorities. For those focused on AI-driven growth and reasonable valuation, TEAM may be the better pick. For investors prioritizing stability and market leadership, NOW remains a solid choice despite margin headwinds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Due to its AI-driven cloud momentum and lower valuation, making it more attractive in terms of growth and value.

Found this useful? Share it

Share:
This article was rewritten in Wrqti's editorial style based on information from the original source above. Content is informational only — not investment advice.