Thomson Reuters Corp vs Global Payments Inc.
A head-to-head of Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | TRI | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $42.00B | $21.29B |
| P/E (TTM) | 27.86 | 24.98 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | 4.18 |
| P/S | 4.98 | 2.10 |
| P/B | 3.55 | 0.86 |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.59 | 9.49 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% | 1.15% |
| Profit Margin | 19.93% | -7.96% |
| Gross Margin | 75.80% | 72.57% |
| Operating Margin | 26.61% | 19.10% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +9.84% | +63.14% |
| FCF Yield | 5.43% | 5.71% |
| Debt / Equity | 20.72 | 95.55 |
| Current Ratio | 0.60 | 0.79 |
Which is better: Thomson Reuters Corp or Global Payments Inc.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Thomson Reuters Corp
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Global Payments Inc.
- ✓Higher dividend yield: Thomson Reuters Corp
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Thomson Reuters Corp
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Global Payments Inc.
- ✓Higher free-cash-flow yield: Global Payments Inc.
Across 13 available metrics, Global Payments Inc. leads 8–5.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.