Thomson Reuters Corp vs Shalfa Facilities Management Co.
A head-to-head of Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Shalfa Facilities Management Co. (9613) across valuation, profitability, growth, and dividends. Green marks the more favourable value on that metric only — not a recommendation.
| Metric | TRI | 9613 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $42.00B | 272.37M SAR |
| P/E (TTM) | 27.86 | 10.22 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | — |
| P/S | 4.98 | 0.60 |
| P/B | 3.55 | 2.28 |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.59 | 6.41 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% | — |
| Profit Margin | 19.93% | 5.56% |
| Gross Margin | 75.80% | 14.72% |
| Operating Margin | 26.61% | 9.94% |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | +9.84% | +63.40% |
| FCF Yield | 5.43% | — |
| Debt / Equity | 20.72 | 95.49 |
| Current Ratio | 0.60 | 1.44 |
Which is better: Thomson Reuters Corp or Shalfa Facilities Management Co.?
- ✓Larger by market cap: Thomson Reuters Corp
- ✓Cheaper valuation (lower P/E): Shalfa Facilities Management Co.
- ✓More profitable (net margin): Thomson Reuters Corp
- ✓Faster revenue growth: Shalfa Facilities Management Co.
Across 10 available metrics, Shalfa Facilities Management Co. leads 6–4.
There's no single "better" — it depends on your goal: income investors may prefer the higher yield, growth investors the faster grower, and value investors the cheaper one. See each stock's page for deeper detail. This is an automated read, not a recommendation.
Share:
This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only, based on available data — not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.